Sabastian “Bat” Mann We may earn revenue from the products available on this page and participate in affiliate programs. Learn more › The Mossberg Patriot has always been a very affordable and reliable bolt-action rifle, and I’ve done a lot of hunting with it in […]
GunsScott Haugen It was 4:30 a.m. when I texted my hunting buddy that we were switching to plan B. I’d just received a notification on my phone from the Moultrie Mobile app. It revealed big groups of wigeon had moved in to feed on green […]
WaterFowlBoth cell cams and conventional cams have a place in your scouting arsenal. Moultrie We may earn revenue from the products available on this page and participate in affiliate programs. Learn more › I think the trail camera is easily the most influential hunting product […]
WaterFowlSabastian “Bat” Mann We may earn revenue from the products available on this page and participate in affiliate programs. Learn more › The Mossberg Patriot has always been a very affordable and reliable bolt-action rifle, and I’ve done a lot of hunting with it in […]
GunsWe may earn revenue from the products available on this page and participate in affiliate programs. Learn more ›
The Mossberg Patriot has always been a very affordable and reliable bolt-action rifle, and I’ve done a lot of hunting with it in its various forms. In fact, I took one of the first Patriot rifles to Africa in 2014. Since then, I’ve hunted across the United States and in Mexico and Canada with a variety of Patriot rifles. Currently, Mossberg lists seven variations of the Patriot and will soon be adding an eighth—the Patriot Predator SF (Suppressor Friendly). Because of the growing popularity of suppressors for hunting, the current hot trend in rifle manufacturing is shorter-barreled rifles. Most Mossberg Patriots have threaded muzzles already, but besides this new rifle, the only Patriot with a barrel shorter than 20 inches is a Predator chambered for 450 Bushmaster. This new rifle offers a short suppressor-friendly barrel, and it’s chambered for a number of popular big-game cartridges.
Related: Sauer 505 Rifle Review
This shorter-barreled Patriot has a threaded, standard-contour, non-fluted barrel and barrel length is cartridge dependent. In 308 Winchester, which is what my test rifle was chambered for, the rifle comes with a 16.25-inch barrel. The other chamberings offered are 22-250 Remington, 6.5 Creedmoor, 450 Bushmaster, 6.5 PRC, 300 Winchester Magnum, and 7mm PRC, and those rifles will have an 18-inch barrel. Mossberg threads the barrels on Patriot rifles into the receiver, and when the headspace is set, they lock the barrel in place with a barrel nut. The rifle will ship with a 15-slot Picatinny scope rail already installed, and Mossberg’s Lightning Bolt Action (LBA) trigger, which is user adjustable from 2 to 7 pounds, will be standard.
The Patriot has a two-lug, push-feed bolt with a 90-degree throw, and the bolt body has spiral fluting around its circumference. The LBA trigger breaks clean and crisp, but the safety does not lock the bolt handle down when you place it on “safe.” The stock on this rifle is the same as other Patriot Predator rifles and is a simple synthetic stock with impressed textured areas at the grip and forend. It’s fitted with a thick and soft rubber butt pad and two sling swivel studs, and the trigger guard is molded into the stock. Like all Patriot rifles, this newest version feeds from a detachable magazine, and the magazines Mossberg uses for the Patriot are one of its best features. They’re made of polymer, only weigh 2.3 ounces, and are released from the stock with a recessed lever just forward of the magazine. The magazine for the 308 Winchester holds five rounds, allowing a field ready 5+1 capacity. Capacity varies with other chamberings.
Related: Browning X-Bolt 2 Speed Rifle Review
My extensive experience with Mossberg Patriot rifles had me expecting a bit better precision than what this rifle delivered. Over the years, I’ve evaluated more than one Patriot rifle that would routinely turn in sub-MOA five-shot groups at 100 yards. This was not one of those rifles. Overall, it averaged 1.48 inches. That’s still not bad, especially considering the Leigh Defense load averaged right at an inch, and that you can pick this rifle up for less than $500. But it does illustrate two things. The first is that quite often, less-expensive rifles are the most finicky when it comes to ammunition. The second is that when you only test one rifle of a specific model, you can never be certain whether you’re testing a best, representative, or worst example. Based on my experience, my guess is that most Patriot Predator SF rifles will shoot at least a little better than my test rifle did.
From an operation standpoint, the rifle functioned perfectly. The magazine was easy to load, the action fed from the magazine smoothly, and extraction and ejection were flawless. However, when you just shorten a rifle’s barrel, it can become unbalanced, and without a suppressorm this Patriot was a tad butt-heavy. That made the rifle handle well and come to the shoulder fast, but it was a tad difficult to hold on target. With a 7.8-ounce Silencer Central Banish Backcountry suppressor attached, the rifle was just a tad muzzle heavy, balancing about a half-inch in front of the front guard screw. This slight muzzle heaviness worked very well for off-hand shooting; ringing 8-inch steel plates off-hand at 100 yards was not a problem, and the rifle performed well on the moving deer target. Mossberg designed this rifle to be suppressed and that’s how most of the shooting was done.
Related: Proof Research Elevation 2.0 Rifle Review
Pros
Cons
In the interest of full disclosure, this rifle has a back story that I’m involved in. Last year, I organized an African safari for seven hunters who’d never been to Africa, and I asked Mossberg to provide a special, shorter-barrel, more suppressor-friendly version of their Patriot Predator for the safari and the pre-safari training at Gunsite Academy. I also suggested Mossberg offer this rifle as a cataloged item. I’m glad to report they’ve added it to their Predator lineup. It’s cool to have influenced a product and be involved in early testing. Jus to be clear, I haven’t and won’t receive any compensation for my involvement.
But that involvement did give me some unique insight that’s generally not gained during a regular rifle review. The training at Gunsite and the safari provided some great field-performance information. I helped with the training and took the time to hunt with every hunter in Africa, where nearly 30 head of game was taken. Some shots were very close and quick, while others were at ranges out to around 300 yards or so. Everyone was impressed with how well the rifles handled with a suppressor attached, and the rifle’s short, suppressed length was nice when getting in and out of the hunting trucks.
Based on the performance of the test rifle, you’ll not be driving any tacks and may not shoot any brag-worthy groups. But you’ll also not break your wallet if you buy one. This is the least expensive and one of the most suppressor-friendly rifles we’ve evaluated all year.
Read Next: Colt CBX TAC Hunter Rifle Review
The post Mossberg Patriot Predator SF Rifle Review—Expert Tested appeared first on Field & Stream.
Articles may contain affiliate links which enable us to share in the revenue of any purchases made.
Scott Haugen It was 4:30 a.m. when I texted my hunting buddy that we were switching to plan B. I’d just received a notification on my phone from the Moultrie Mobile app. It revealed big groups of wigeon had moved in to feed on green […]
WaterFowlIt was 4:30 a.m. when I texted my hunting buddy that we were switching to plan B. I’d just received a notification on my phone from the Moultrie Mobile app. It revealed big groups of wigeon had moved in to feed on green grass near the edge of a pond. I put the Edge Pro trail cam there four days prior and it paid off. We shot our limit in under 30 minutes.
Four years ago, I started running non-cellular trail cams for ducks. And while it was helpful for understanding duck behavior and migration patterns, I was always one step behind the birds. Last season, I switched to using Moultrie Mobile cellular cameras, and everything changed. Now, I get real-time updates when ducks move into any of my spots. But don’t be fooled: Setting trail cams for ducks isn’t as easy as getting a notification on your phone and then walking out back to shoot them. It takes preparation, scouting, discipline, and, most importantly, the ability to be mobile.
Last year, during my 100-plus-day Pacific Flyway duck season, I learned a few things about running trail cams for waterfowl. Some tactics are based on traditional duck scouting techniques, and others go hand in hand with running trail cameras for other species. Either way, each technique led to successful hunts and heavier straps. So get a cellular trail camera and use these ten tactics to kill more birds next season.
Checking traditional SD trail cameras is time-consuming, and if you aren’t pulling cards every day during duck season, you might miss a push of birds. Cell cams remove the need to check your camera every day. They relay information instantaneously. Set the notifications on your smartphone, and you’ll receive up-to-the-minute action as it unfolds with the cellular models. This is especially helpful during peak migration, when big flocks of birds migrate through an area quickly. Sometimes, ducks only stop for a day or two to refuel before continuing south. Where legal, a reliable cell cam, like the Edge Pro, will notify you when the birds are in so you can hunt them before they’re gone.
Come waterfowl season, I set at least two dozen cams to monitor the movement of ducks and geese. Most hunters don’t need to run that many, but the idea is simple: The more cameras you have out, the more area you cover to find birds. I’ll increase the number of cams I have set depending on water levels, time of season, and migration peaks. The later in the season it gets, the more cameras I use. I’ll set them on private and public land, rivers, creeks, sloughs, ponds, and fields. Anywhere you can get a camera out will help you better pattern birds.
The easiest and most secure way to set a trail cam for ducks is by attaching it to a 4×4 wooden fence post. I screw in a Moultrie Mobile Edge Series Flex Mount into the post, drive it into the ground, and attach the camera. This mount is secure and can be moved for precise positioning. Be sure to screw the post into a spike so if the water rises, it won’t float away. If you are setting cameras in areas where water levels may rise—like in creeks, riverbanks, and ponds—use a longer wooden fence post to keep the camera dry. Also, make sure the post is anchored well enough that winds and currents won’t carry it away.
While trail cameras are excellent scouting tools, it’s essential to do some pre-season scouting before setting them. In the off-season, I’m looking to food sources to set my cams on. I’m also noting where different foods are located based on future water levels. Some foods are easily accessible to ducks with little rain. Others don’t become available to birds until late in the season, following a high water event or even a freeze. Certain food sources require flooding to allow ducks access to it. Keep track of agricultural activity near your hunting area, which will also impact duck movement during the season.
A 15 second video clip captures sights and sounds a still image never will. Every season, I discover high numbers of ducks using an area based on the sound alone. One or two ducks might be swimming in front of the camera, but thousands more can be heard off-camera. Use video mode to get the most information you can from your cams.
A hundred wigeon grazing on new grass might seem inviting, but nothing attracts birds better to an area than live birds. So if you’re monitoring a long-term food source or roosting sites, let the number of ducks build on your cams before hunting them. For these locations, I usually wait until numbers hit a few thousand to hunt them. That won’t be the case for every area, so wait until you think there are enough birds to get multiple hunts out of it. Once you hit a huntable number, go in early, shoot fast, and exit quickly. Doing so will allow you more hunts in this same spot. If you hunt a spot too soon, before numbers build, you might only get one shoot from it.
On the flip side, short-term food sources should be hunted right away. With these, there’s no need to let bird numbers build for fear the food might be quickly depleted. Short-term food sources are dictated by fluctuating water levels, wind intensity, and bird numbers. A rising creek, a section of a river, or even a flooded field may only offer ducks access to food for a short time. This can last anywhere from a day or two to 12 hours or less. How fast water levels rise and fall determines how long ducks can reach the food.
Identify these areas in the off-season and monitor them daily on your cams. Once the cameras are showing water and ducks, hunt them immediately. High winds and rising water can move food around ponds, congregating it on the leeward side. Set a camera in these spots and hunt it as soon as the first birds arrive. This is also true for skinny creeks that run high and offer ducks access to food they otherwise couldn’t reach. In flooded fields and sloughs that expose food, either by access or by physically knocking food from stalks, get on ‘em. Food that can’t support the arrival of thousands of ducks should be hunted fast before ducks consume it and leave.
Cellular trail cameras are set to achieve one goal: To hunt the X. For this reason, you can pack light. You’re already where birds want to be, so don’t go overboard. A simple blind (sometimes you don’t even need one) and a handful of decoys will do the trick. A half dozen floaters with a couple dozen silhouettes are also easy to carry in for one trip. I usually set three to five dozen Big Al’s silhouette decoys along shorelines and in shallow water. Small spreads are also easy to pick up and relocate should the X shift for whatever reason. Hunting pressure, wind direction, and storms can cause the X to shift overnight, or even during the course of a hunt. Effectively placing trail cams allows you to stay on the X—and being where the ducks want to be is more important than the number of decoys you set.
Match the hatch, or, in other words, keep your spread as realistic as possible. If a trail camera reveals small flocks of ducks slowing moving into an area, set out a small spread. If there’s a mix of species coming in at once, mimic that in your spread. If birds pack closely together while feeding, arrange your decoys the same way. This is one of the biggest advantages of using a trail cam for ducks—you can see exactly how the birds behave. Replicating this will help you finish more ducks over the decoys.
Cellular trail cameras reveal where ducks want to be at that moment. Use your cams to track bird movement daily throughout the season. Don’t hunt an area just because the birds were there the last few days. Use your cams to confirm if spots are holding birds, and then be ready to make adjustments. That means having all the gear you need ready to go at a moment’s notice. As the X shifts, move with it.
The post 10 Trail Cam Tips for Hunting Ducks appeared first on Field & Stream.
Articles may contain affiliate links which enable us to share in the revenue of any purchases made.
Both cell cams and conventional cams have a place in your scouting arsenal. Moultrie We may earn revenue from the products available on this page and participate in affiliate programs. Learn more › I think the trail camera is easily the most influential hunting product […]
WaterFowlWe may earn revenue from the products available on this page and participate in affiliate programs. Learn more ›
I think the trail camera is easily the most influential hunting product of the last quarter century, and recent whitetail harvest statistics back it up. Today’s hunters are killing bigger and older bucks than ever before, due largely to the information revealed on our trail cameras. It’s a lot easier to pass on young 115-inch, 8-pointer when your cameras have shown you that there’s a mature, 150-inch 10-pointer in the area. And those same cameras can help you dial in on that big 10’s habits and set up in the perfect spot to put a tag on him.
The earliest trail cameras evolved from the Trail Timer Game Monitor, a digital device that debuted in the mid-1980s and relied on a string stretched across a game trail. When a critter walked by and tripped the string, the timer would record the day and time of the event on a digital circuit board. Trail cameras using 35mm film came along a few years later, then digital cams in the early 2000s, and in 2007, Moultrie introduced the first cellular trail camera.
Cellular trail cameras have improved dramatically in the past few years, and this technology rightfully dominates the modern trail camera conversation. But traditional trail cameras have improved, too, and they still hold their own in the modern hunter’s toolbox. As a person who makes a good part of his living writing about guiding for whitetail deer, I depend on a mix of both cellular and traditional trail cameras, and I have more than a dozen units deployed on multiple properties all season. Each camera type has its place, and one isn’t necessarily better than the other. The question is: What would work best for you? One, the other, or a combination. Here’s a look at the pros and cons of each camera style.
Related: 50 of the Craziest Trail Camera Photos You’ve Ever Seen
Pros
Cons
Ideal For
Cellular trail cameras use cell phone data to relay photo information back to the user remotely and immediately. Most of the time, a mobile app allows the user to view and sort images and even update the camera settings with a smart phone. The best apps factor in environmental data such as weather, pressure, and moon phases to build long-term data sets for your particular hunting area. Some even use smart software for critter recognition (that actually works really well).
There are obvious benefits to the real-time scouting information cell cameras provide. Deciding whether to knock off work early to go hunting is much easier if you know a big buck was under your stand earlier that day. When my job is to put a paying client in the best spot to shoot a buck during a brief timeframe, I depend heavily on cellular trail cameras to give me the most recent information.
To me, cell cameras are most useful when set in areas that are difficult to access, and where I don’t want to be tromping around to check SD cards. I frequently place my cell cams on trails and creek crossings near bedding cover, or along scrape lines deep in the hardwood timber. These are places where I may not get many pictures compared to a mineral lick or food plot edge—but the right photo can be the clue that breaks the case, so to speak, and leads to a filled tag.
Real-time scouting info is particularly useful for other critters, too. In the spring I depend heavily on cell cams to scout turkeys on small pieces of private property. When gobblers are henned up and mum, and you’re confined by property boundaries, cell cams can reassure that you’re still in the chips. My wife shot a big gobbler at noon on a late-season hunt last spring and had hunted all day without hearing a peep. We knew that strutter was around, though, because we’d seen him on a cell camera at midday the two previous days in a row. And, of course, for absentee landowners, cellular cameras provide obvious security and surveillance benefits. Folks with nefarious intent might be able to sabotage the camera, but not before it sends pictures of them back to the user.
Of course, cell cams aren’t perfect. Modern cameras have way better battery life than the cell cams of just a few years ago—but they still require anywhere from 8 to 16 AAs to get started and drain them more quickly.than your typical conventional cam. Though cell cameras themselves aren’t much pricier than traditional trail cameras, the data plans can be expensive (usually in the ballpark of $13 per camera, per month for unlimited images and 50 videos). And, of course, for any of that to work, cell phone service is required. Though cell cams take photos that are plenty good enough for scouting purposes—and you can usually download hi-resolution images—standard trail cameras take better quality images on average.
Related: Top Trail Camera Tips for More and Better Photos
Pros
Cons
Ideal For
As good as cell cameras are, traditional trail cameras still do some things better. They’re much easier on batteries, which is a real expense to consider if, like me, you’re running multiple cameras. A number of conventional cams will run all season—or longer—on just four AA batteries (compared to your typical 16 AAs for cell cams), which saves both money and weight in the pack.
The majority of trail cameras are still set in easy-to-check places like over mineral licks, next to feeders, and on the edges of crop fields and food plots. In spots like that, cell cameras lose some advantage, since SD cards can be checked at midday without disturbing much. Plus, since standard trail cameras typically have more megapixels than cellular cameras, you can use them in such areas to take really crisp, detailed photos of a buck.
Though I’ve had some success—and really enjoy—targeting individual bucks all season, it’s not always the best way to fill a tag. My usual season-long strategy involves taking an inventory of the deer herd on several small to mid-size properties, identifying multiple bucks I’d be happy with shooting, and then using weather conditions, season phase, and knowledge of the property to make my hunting decisions. Sure, if I get a recent daylight photo of a good deer, I hunt him immediately. But far more often, I’m setting up in what I know is a good spot, where I know shooter bucks live, when the weather conditions are favorable, and hoping for the best. I’ve killed a lot of nice deer that way. I depend on a bunch of traditional trail cameras to help with that effort, partly for the cost savings and partly because 60% of the areas I hunt have no cell phone service.
Of course, traditional cameras have their drawbacks, too. If you’re checking them once per week, like I do, the information is obviously dated. Nothing like knowing a big deer was under your stand last Sunday morning after you stayed out too late last Saturday night. Pulling SD cards and reviewing images on a card reader or computer without an app is fun, but also time consuming—especially if you’re sorting images from multiple cameras. Some say that traditional trail cameras are more reliable than cell cams, but they’re not. SD cards get corrupted and fail all of the time. Blades of grass trigger endless photos and drain batteries. Power switches are forgotten, and cameras are aimed too high. Those things can happen with cell cameras, too, but the difference is you can correct problems proactively by taking a few test images and checking your app in the field before you leave.
Related: Where to Put Trail Cameras for Big Bucks
If you only need one or two trail cameras, spring for cell cams. The benefits are more than worth the extra cost of using them, and once they’re up and going, they’re less hassle than traditional trail cameras.
But if you’re like me and running multiple cameras in multiple areas, a combination of both styles is best. Place the standard trail cameras in easy-to-check places, to keep tabs on what deer are in the area, and of course anywhere that cell coverage is non-existent. Treat your cell cameras as more surgical tools. Once you find a big buck, use them to really home in on his routine, or to tell you when the deer are moving way too much for you to stay at work.
The post Cellular Trail Cameras vs Conventional Trail Cameras appeared first on Field & Stream.
Articles may contain affiliate links which enable us to share in the revenue of any purchases made.
Matthew Every We may earn revenue from the products available on this page and participate in affiliate programs. Learn more › The 22 rifle isn’t what it used to be. For ages, your average 22 was more serious than a bb gun, sure—but not a […]
GunsWe may earn revenue from the products available on this page and participate in affiliate programs. Learn more ›
The 22 rifle isn’t what it used to be. For ages, your average 22 was more serious than a bb gun, sure—but not a lot more serious. That’s all changed now. With the growing popularity of long-range rimfire matches and an increase in ammo costs driving people to shoot more trainer-style guns, the standard for an affordable rimfire has been elevated, and there may be no better example of what you can now get in a 22 for under $500 than the Springfield Armory Model 2020 Rimfire rifle.
This 22 is not brand new (except for a few new colors available this year), but we hadn’t really taken a good look at it until recently—and it’s just too good not to do so now The Model 2020 Rimfire comes in a wood-stocked Classic option and a polymer-stocked Target model. Over the past few weeks, I’ve been shooting and testing the latter. Overall, it’s an extremely well-thought-out rimfire that you can use to train, compete, or put meat on the table. Here is a closer look at the guns features and how it performed in my tests.
Out of the box, the 2020 Rimfire comes with everything you need to start shooting, except for ammo and an optic, and Springfield throws in a quality zippered soft case, which is a nice extra. The first thing you’ll notice about the rifle is a very sturdy polymer stock. It’s the kind of stock that would put some polymer centerfire stocks to shame. I’ve shot a Model 2020 Waypoint centerfire, and the stock does feel very similar. It has a slight palm swell, and overall feels like a rifle made for a grown-up.
The rifle is matte blued, which is durable enough for what it’s designed for, and it has a 4140 high-polish steel bolt. The bolt features dual extractors, and it runs smoothly. The entire rifle is built on a Remington 700 footprint, including the trigger, so you can swap out parts, such as the stock and trigger, should you want an upgrade. An extended magazine release comes standard, and the rifle accepts Ruger 10/22-style magazines, which are very easy to find. Finally, the muzzle is threaded for a suppressor or other muzzle device.
Related: Best 22 LR Rifles of 2024
After giving the rifle a once over and putting a little oil on the bolt, I mounted a Maven RS.1 riflescope. The 15 power, first-focal-plane scope might seem to be a bit much for squirrel hunting and plinking, but I decided to use it for two reasons. One, I could adjust the parallax, which makes close shots easier and more precise. Two, more rimfire competition shooters are using first-focal-plane target scopes and dialing turrets for matches. With capped turrets, the RS.1 doesn’t exactly fit that category, but it’s pretty darn close.
Next I zeroed the rifle before shooting five, 5-shot groups at 50 yards with five different kinds of ammo. I also shot the rifle from various positions and from barricades, and I took it on a woods walk to see how it would feel to carry around while hunting. Throughout the test, I evaluated things like fit-and-finish, durability, and reliability, noting any jams or failures.
In the hand, this rifle feels more like a centerfire than a rimfire. And that’s a good thing. For target shooting—which this Target model is obviously meant for—the extra weight is helpful. And for training purposes, it’s really helpful, as it simulates shooting a bigger rifle. The RS.1 made it even heavier, though, and while this didn’t make it impossible to carry around, it did bog me down a bit on the woods walk. In the end, the rifle’s weight is just right for a target gun or trainer and not too heavy for the woods, but if you’re setting it up primarily for hunting, you’ll want to go with a lighter optic.
Manipulating the rifle was extremely easy and intuitive. The magazine release works flawlessly, the bolt is smooth, the safety snaps back and forth positively, and the trigger—while a bit heavy—is consistent. The stock also feels extremely solid when shooting off of a barricade, and the flat surface on the bottom of the forend is really nice for shooting off of a bag. Everything about this rifle is user-friendly and solid with excellent fit-and-finish and a ton of quality for the money.
I used five different kinds of ammo to test the 2020 Rimfire: Augila Subsonic, CCI Standard Velocity, CCI Mini Mag, American Eagle, and CCI Clean. Springfield guarantees their rifle will shoot three-shot groups of 1 inch or less at 50 yards. I took five-shot groups, as this is a more demanding test of accuracy. Even with the five-shot groups, Springfield can stand behind its guarantee. My biggest group measured .99 inch with the American Eagle ammo, while the best groups measured .56 with Aguila Subsonic and .59 with CCI Standard. I even took a 10-shot group with the Aguila, emptying an entire magazine, and it came in at just .79 inches. Whether it’s ringing steel or taking headshots at squirrels, this rifle will do the job.
I did have a couple of feeding problems with my test rifle, but it was mostly ammo dependent. Overall the dual-extractor design of the bolt and the well-made magazine work very well together. Should you have a jam, its pretty easy to clear with the extended magazine release. You could also play around with different magazines, as there are many to choose from in the 10/22 world. However, the Springfield magazine that comes with the rifle is put together very well.
The trigger on the Waypoint is a bit stiff, but it is consistent. Once I got used to it, it was very easy to shoot. At one point I put the rifle in the hands of a novice shooter, and she was able to hit 2-inch steel plates at 50 yards almost every time. Should you really have an issue with the trigger, you can upgrade with a number of Remington 700 triggers on the market. Still, I wouldn’t have a problem taking this rifle to a precision rimfire match out of the box.
Bottom line: This rifle is a screaming deal. At under $500, you get a 22 that anyone would be proud to own. For the competitive shooter, it represents a huge value, and would serve as a great base to build a clone of any Remington 700 centerfire. The best thing is, though, that you don’t have to. This rifle is built well enough from the factory that it can keep up with a number of higher-priced rifles at a match as is.
For the hunter, the Target version of the 2020 Rimfire is a bit on the heavy side. But that’s OK. Springfield makes a walnut version that weighs more than a pound less, and looks really good in the bargain. Couple that with a lightweight rimfire scope, and you’ll have a go-anywhere hunting rifle that should last you a lifetime. If you’ve been eyeing up a rimfire trainer or just want a really accurate 22 to shoot, I highly recommend the Model 2020 Rimfire.
The post Springfield Amory Model 2020 Rimfire Rifle Review appeared first on Field & Stream.
Articles may contain affiliate links which enable us to share in the revenue of any purchases made.
Mark Taylor We may earn revenue from the products available on this page and participate in affiliate programs. Learn more › Even as airgun technology evolves, several companies continue to produce guns that use multi-pump pneumatic power plants. They are flexible, reliable, self-contained, quiet, and […]
GunsWe may earn revenue from the products available on this page and participate in affiliate programs. Learn more ›
Even as airgun technology evolves, several companies continue to produce guns that use multi-pump pneumatic power plants. They are flexible, reliable, self-contained, quiet, and relatively affordable. The Seneca Dragonfly MK2 is a rifle that combines tried-and-true multi-pump technology with innovative features that take its convenience and performance to the next level.
First and foremost, the rifle offers a rotary magazine, eliminating the need to load a pellet by hand before each shot. Then there’s the gun’s pumping mechanism, which utilizes a unique “butterfly” multi-link design to keep pumping effort relatively consistent even as the air chamber fills. I’ve been shooting the Dragonfly MK2 for the past few months while noting its accuracy, groupings, features, handling, and overall performance. Here are my thoughts:
Specs
Pros
Cons
My introduction to airgun shooting came through multi-pump pneumatic rifles. First was the Crosman 760 Pumpmaster that Santa brought for me when I was in second grade. Later, I saved up and bought a larger, more powerful Crosman 766. My brother went the Daisy Powerline route. We shot the daylights out of those rifles, which were handy, practical, reliable, and plenty accurate for our pest and small game hunting needs. I still have a soft spot for multi-pumps, so I jumped at the chance to test a loaner Dragonfly MK2 from Seneca, a division of Air Venturi.
With its wooden stock and clean lines, the Dragonfly MK2 is a pretty rifle. It feels solid in hand, too, and the build quality seems quite good, especially for a gun that costs about $200. That said, after several hundred shots, I realized that one of the screws attaching the pumping mechanism to the forestock had fallen out. When I tested the others, they were loose, too. I was able to buy a replacement screw at my local hardware store, but it’s zinc and not black, so it’s a noticeable fix. I removed all the other screws, too, and slathered the threads with Loctite. They have held well since. I’d recommend adding Loctite to all the screws before shooting the gun and testing screw tightness regularly.
The Dragonfly MK2 has an adjustable rear sight and a fiber optic front blade. The open sights work just fine for general plinking. But to better test the rifle’s accuracy, I added a CenterPoint 4X32 scope. The short scope rings required me to remove the rear sight, and I could still see the orange fiber optic blade at the bottom of the scope picture. If this were my rifle, I’d use medium rings, if not larger.
The rifle’s trigger is metal and feels solid. It’s a two-stage trigger that broke consistently at a fairly stout 5 pounds. It is not adjustable. The side bolt felt solid and smooth, and the rotary magazine worked well and was convenient. The butterfly pumping mechanism works as advertised, helping keep pumping effort fairly consistent even as the air chamber fills up to its maximum at 15 pumps. I didn’t test the actual force required for pumping, but it’s something even younger shooters would be able to manage. My young adult daughter had no trouble pumping the gun, though the long pumping stroke was a challenge with her relatively short wingspan. Pumping still takes some effort, so this isn’t one of those guns where you’ll blow through a couple hundred pellets in a session.
The Dragonfly MK2 features a mildly snappy report that increases as you work up from the minimum of three pumps to the maximum of 15. The barrel features 1/2×20 threads for the addition of a suppressor. Even though I’d consider the gun backyard-friendly, even at full power, I put a small DonnyFL suppressor on the rifle, and it turned the snap into a quiet thump.
Arguably, the biggest benefit of a multi-pump pneumatic is power flexibility. Want to plink? Pumping it up a few times before each shot means you can do more shooting and less pumping. Need more power for a hunt in the squirrel woods? Pump it 10 or 15 times and have at it.
The flip side to that coin is that you’ll need to know how the rifle performs at those different power levels. As expected, hours of target time with the Dragonfly MK2 confirmed that impact points shifted based on different power levels and pellets. Over the course of a couple months, I put probably 500 pellets through my test gun. Its performance was impressive.
First, I tested velocity with FX 18.1-grain domed pellets. At 15 pumps, velocity ranged from 691 to 697 feet per second, good for just under 20 foot-pounds of energy. At 10 pumps, the velocity range was 647 to 659 fps (about 17 fps), and at five pumps, the rifle was pushing those pellets down range at about 550 fps (12 fps). Consistent power like that is the first step toward accuracy.
As expected, based on the buzz since its introduction, this rifle is quite accurate. Because I used a 4-power scope, I did all my testing at 25 yards, shooting off a Caldwell Lead Sled. While I usually shoot five-shot groups, I shot seven-shot groups with the Dragonfly MK2 to correlate with the magazine’s capacity.
The FX pellets I used for the velocity tests are almost always the first I use in any accuracy tests because they consistently perform well. They did in this rifle, too. My best groups were at five pumps and typically in the ½-inch to ¾-inch range. Groups opened up a bit at 10 pumps and 15 pumps. I got similar groups with 18-grain Air Arms domed pellets, another of my go-to test pellets.
One of my favorite .22 rounds for higher-powered guns is the 21.14-grain Baracuda Match domed pellets. These produced one of my best groups. At 10 pumps with those beefy pellets, five out of seven pellets went into a single, 3/8-inch hole. Frustratingly, that group also featured two flyers, but they were likely shooter’s error.
As I was wrapping up testing, one of my daughters—a 22-year-old recent college grad—asked if she could shoot the gun. I loaded up a magazine with the Air Arms pellets and gave her a quick lesson on how to operate the rifle. A casual but not avid shooter, she shot off a sandbag-topped tripod at a 25-yard target. The result? The best group the gun had produced in two months of shooting. Six of the seven rounds went into a single ¼-inch hole. It showed just how accurate this rifle can be in the hands of a steady shooter with young eyes.
The Seneca Dragonfly MK2 would be even more of a tack-driver with a better trigger and higher magnification scope. Shooters who love to experiment with different power levels and different pellets will enjoy fiddling with the Dragonfly to get the most out of the rifle’s capabilities. But the gun is easy enough to zero that if you don’t want to do a lot of testing, you can still be shooting good groups in a hurry.
Accurate. Flexible. Pretty. Affordable. There’s a lot to like about the Seneca Dragonfly MK2—whether you’re a backyard plinker, a small game hunter, or both. The butterfly pumping technology is not only innovative, but works well. And the rotary magazine adds to shooting convenience. The loose stock screws were a bit frustrating, especially given that the rifle is otherwise solidly built. That’s far from a deal-breaker, however, and easily remedied with a little effort and Loctite.
Will the Seneca Dragonfly MK2 become a long-lived classic like the Sheridan Silver Streak or the Crosman 760 Pumpmaster? Given rapid advancements in airgun technology, it’s hard to say. From a looks and performance perspective, it certainly has the potential.
The post Seneca Dragonfly MK2 Air Rifle, Expert Tested appeared first on Field & Stream.
Articles may contain affiliate links which enable us to share in the revenue of any purchases made.
We may earn revenue from the products available on this page and participate in affiliate programs. Learn more › Whether you’re looking for a new rifle scope, trail camera, or tree stand, Amazon has a ton of hunting gear from top brands in the industry. […]
BowhuntingWe may earn revenue from the products available on this page and participate in affiliate programs. Learn more ›
Whether you’re looking for a new rifle scope, trail camera, or tree stand, Amazon has a ton of hunting gear from top brands in the industry. And right now, through July 17, there are a bunch of Prime Day hunting deals going on for a limited time. You can currently get up to $120 off optics, knives, apparel, and more at Amazon—with prices starting at just $10. Discounted brands include favorites like Vortex, Moultrie, and Bushnell.
We’ve scoured the site to find all the best Prime Day hunting deals this week. We’ll keep updating this list over the coming hours, so keep checking back for more sales as they drop.
The post The 42 Best Prime Day Hunting Deals appeared first on Field & Stream.
Articles may contain affiliate links which enable us to share in the revenue of any purchases made.
The new Sauer 505 Synchro XT bolt-action rifle. Sabastian “Bat” Mann We may earn revenue from the products available on this page and participate in affiliate programs. Learn more › J.P. Sauer & Sohn, more commonly known as just Sauer, is part of the Blaser […]
GunsWe may earn revenue from the products available on this page and participate in affiliate programs. Learn more ›
J.P. Sauer & Sohn, more commonly known as just Sauer, is part of the Blaser Group which also includes Blaser, Mauser, and John Rigby & Company. The 505 is the newest rifle from Sauer, who claim it was “designed to be the most beautiful bolt action rifle in the world.” Beauty will always be in the eye of the beholder, but still, you expect a new rifle from an iconic company like Sauer—the oldest gunmaker in Germany—to be something special. And the new 505 is just that.
How beautiful you find Sauer’s latest bolt gun will have a lot to do with which stock you choose, and you have eight to choose from, including one carbon-fiber, three polymer, and four highly figured walnut options, several featuring thumbholes and adjustable combs. I tested the 505 Synchro XT model, which features a polymer thumbhole stock. I can’t say I found this particular model to be the “most beautiful” bolt, but I was still very impressed—partly because you can change the look and functionality of this remarkably versatile rifle with a single tool. Let’s take a closer look.
Related: Browning X-Bolt 2 Speed Rifle Review
Related: Proof Research Elevation 2.0 Rifle Review
The heart of the 505 is a completely new action which offers modular versatility. Along with the eight stock options, the rifle can be had in 19 different chamberings. What is so unique about the 505 is that you can swap between these eight stocks and 19 chamberings on your own, and without any special tools. The key to this system’s unique versatility is one of the quick-detach sling swivel studs on the rifle. When you remove it, you’ll see it has a hex-head wrench that’s hidden in the rifle’s stock. This single wrench is the tool you use to swap stocks, change barrels, and adjust the comb height. It is simply ingenious.
The action is new, made of steel, and features integration with the one-piece Blaser saddle scope-mount system that allows for removal and reinstallation without loss of zero. It features a one-piece, six-lug bolt, with a Sako-style extractor and plunger ejector. The action does not have a traditional safety. On the rear of the bolt, there’s a sliding actuator that you push forward and serves as the safety. You noiselessly push it forward with your thumb to cock the rifle and depress a red button that becomes visible when the rifle is cocked, to uncock or “safe” the rifle. What’s amazing is that the 60-degree bolt operation requires nearly the same minimal force after firing as it does before.
The action feeds from either a 3+1 (provided) or 5+1 (optional) detachable magazine, which is held in place by a recessed release button located just forward of the magazine well. Interestingly, this magazine-release button can be locked to circumvent accidental release. The Quattro trigger on this rifle is the best trigger I’ve ever pulled on any rifle. It’s user adjustable between 0.77, 1.65, 2.20, and 2.75 pounds, and when you press the trigger is does not feel like you’re pulling a conventional trigger; it feels more like you’re touching a button—a button that seems to move almost imperceivibly—that makes the rifle fire.
The stock is a two piece design that includes a buttstock and a forend. The butt stock is attached by a single hex screw and the forend is attached by a latch that clamps onto a spigot system on the action. At no point does the stock forend contact the barrel. Both stock sections are attached and removed with the hex wrench/sling swivel stud. Sauer offers a quick attach bipod adapter that replaces the front sling swivel, and it interfaces with Spartan Precision bipods and tripods.
With the forend removed, you’ll see three hex screws located at the front-bottom of the receiver. When you loosen these screws with the supplied wrench, you can rotate the forend spigot mount 90 degrees and remove the barrel. This is how you swap between different chamberings. If you opt for a cartridge with a different rim diameter than your current chambering, you’ll need a different bolt, which will cost you $600. Extra barrels retail for between $1000 and $1300, and the Blaser scope mount with 1-inch, 30mm, 34mm, 36mm, or 40mm rings, costs $526.
Related: Aero Precision SOLUS Hunter Rifle Review
Let’s be clear about one thing, this rifle operates with the precision of a Swiss watch. No matter what control you attempt to manipulate, part you try to adjust, remove, or attach, there are no hitches, glitches, or hang ups whatsoever. As you would expect of a finely crafted German-made rifle, everything works to perfection and with utter smoothness. With most any bolt-action rifle, you can apply torque to the bolt in a way to make it either not work or drag a bit. Not with this rifle. The bolt glides inside the action as effortlessly as poking your thumb in a warm bowl of pudding. The trigger was also fantastic, allowing you to almost think the rifle into firing.
Regarding the rifle’s precision performance, I shot multiple five-shot groups with three different hunting loads from the bench and the average group size for all three was 1.18 inches. This is good but not great for a $3500 rifle. But remember, this is a switch-barrel rifle delivering near-MOA performance.
Though generally not a big fan of thumbhole stocks, I was surprised I liked this one as much as I did. I do not wrap my shooting thumb around the wrist of a rifle’s stock, and even with the thumbhole design, I could comfortably keep it on the right side of the stock just above my trigger finger. There was a sort of shelf there that provided a comfortable reference for thumb placement. I also adjusted the comb so it allowed for a perfect cheek weld while aligning my eye with the riflescope. This helped while shooting from the bench and off-hand.
The sliding safety/cocking button took some getting used to, just because it is so different from your average bolt-action rifles. The more I shot the rifle, however, the better I liked the system. What really stands out, and maybe cannot be repeated enough, is just how smooth the safety and everything else about this rifle worked. The rifle is a bit butt heavy, balancing about 2 inches behind the front of the action, which explains the nimble handling. But with the Banish Backcountry suppressor attached, the rifle balanced perfectly for field work. A carbon-fiber stock is available for the 505, and it will cut a pound and a half off the weight. Here’s a breakdown of the precision-testing results.
Related: Springfield Armory Model 2020 Redline Rifle Review
Pros
Cons
In the interest of full disclosure, the rifle I tested was the German version of the rifle that will be sold in America. This is why the muzzle was threaded at 15×1 and why I needed an adapter to 5/8×24 for the suppressor. American rifles will have more conventional and varying muzzle thread pitches depending on the chambering. For example, the American 308 Winchester will have a 9/16×24 thread pitch. Also, this rifle had the black stock that will be on the 505 as sold in Germany. American rifles will have a Titanium Grey stock. Other than those differences, the rifle I tested will be the rifle you can purchase in America, along with a version with the carbon-fiber stock ($6500) and a grade 5 wood stock ($4500). There’s also the least expensive ($3200) version with a traditionally styled synthetic stock. The other stocks along with all 19 chamberings will be available on special order.
This is not the most-precise shooting rifle I’ve ever tested, nor the lightest. However, this is clearly one of the best-made, most versatile, smartly configured, and innovative rifles I’ve ever seen or evaluated. Admittedly, the cartridge and even stock interchangeability may not be appealing to hunters who like a different rifle for every pursuit. But this is a very practical one-rifle answer to about any hunting question, from prairie dogs to Cape buffalo.
Read Next: Ruger American Gen II Rifle Review
The post Sauer 505 Rifle Review—Expert Tested appeared first on Field & Stream.
Articles may contain affiliate links which enable us to share in the revenue of any purchases made.
We may earn revenue from the products available on this page and participate in affiliate programs. Learn more › Fourth of July is a time to celebrate being an American—and what’s more American than a new gun? Whether you’re looking for a handgun, shotgun, or […]
GunsWe may earn revenue from the products available on this page and participate in affiliate programs. Learn more ›
Fourth of July is a time to celebrate being an American—and what’s more American than a new gun? Whether you’re looking for a handgun, shotgun, or rifle, there are some fantastic 4th of July gun sales going on this week at major retailers like Cabela’s and Palmetto State Armory. You can currently score up to 50 percent off top firearm brands including Browning, Smith & Wesson, Remington, and Sig Sauer.
Below are all the best 4th of July gun sales we’ve seen so far. We’ll update this list leading up to the holiday, so check back as more deals go live. Many of these prices are only available for a limited time so it’s a good idea to shop sooner rather than later.
The post The Best 4th of July Gun Sales Going on This Week appeared first on Field & Stream.
Articles may contain affiliate links which enable us to share in the revenue of any purchases made.
Antler growth is far enough along by July 4th to get a sense of which bucks will be your best. John Hafner Photography We may earn revenue from the products available on this page and participate in affiliate programs. Learn more › For most of […]
BowhuntingWe may earn revenue from the products available on this page and participate in affiliate programs. Learn more ›
For most of us, July is a month reserved for fishing, grilling, and maybe the beach. Not Minnesota whitetail expert Bob Borowiak, who starts scouting around July 4th and continues until the season opener. While most successful deer hunters recognize the need for thorough scouting, many wait until just before the season opener to begin. Borowiak insists that his midsummer observation sessions are responsible for most of the big deer he tags during the archery season.
Most of us would do well to listen to Borowiak, a retired 76-year old hunter from Houston, Minnesota. Though he didn’t start bowhunting whitetails until he was in his mid-30s, the expert has more than 30 P&Y bucks to his credit. At least 10 of those bucks were taken in the first weeks of the archery season and were the direct result of scouting that Borowiak did on summer evenings. Here’s a look at the preseason prep work of one of the most successful bowhunters I know.
In a whitetail world obsessed with trail cameras, Borowiak’s scouting regimen relies on good old-fashioned personal observation; his favorite tactic is to glass fields and food plots from distant vantage points. “I’m lucky in that I’m retired and have more free time than most,” he says. “But I am out there almost every night starting around July 4th. The one farm I hunt I can actually set my spotting scope up in my truck and park 500-600 yards away and glass fields. That’s plenty close enough to judge antlers, and the nice thing is, I’m parked right on a road edge and deer are used to the sounds of traffic, so the truck doesn’t bother them.”
On other properties that don’t have such convenient glassing setups, Borowiak hikes in and sets up in discreet locations that allow him to observe fields and food plots, but not be seen, heard, or smelled by deer. “It’s also important to consider how you’re going to get out of there at dusk without spooking deer, so I make sure I’m not set up too close to any food source where deer are going to be when it gets dark,” he said.
While most hunters are content to let trail cameras do their summer intel for them, Borowiak insists nothing beats personal observation. “Cameras are definitely a good tool and part of my scouting, but they are limited in their ability,” he says. “They only give a small glimpse of what’s happening out in a field, while I can get a big picture view with my spotting scope. For example, I’ve had years where I might have three or more mature bucks using the same field for their evening feeding. If all I had was a camera, I might get one or two of those bucks, and just for a narrow window of time, a snapshot. Glassing allows me to take a good long look and monitor the entire herd, not just the buck that steps in front of a camera.”
That extended observation allows Borowiak not only a long time to evaluate antlers, but also to assess personality. “When those bucks start shedding velvet, some of them are going to disperse, but some will stick around. The more dominant bucks–which you can tell easily from observing them, even in velvet, have a better chance of sticking around. At this point I’m not trying to nail down specific patterns of individual bucks; I’m just getting an idea of what’s out there and the general areas used by bucks.”
Related: Best Spotting Scopes of 2024
While much has been said and written about patterning bucks—especially in the early season—Borowiak uses the term cautiously, even though he’s deadly at bagging early-season trophies. “I’ve killed a couple bucks that made repeat visits to the same area on a regular basis, but I’m convinced those cases are rare, especially with bucks 4 or 5 years old,” he said. “With older deer, it’s more realistic to expect that, if you see a buck in one spot one night, he might be back a week later. I shot a 160-class buck two years ago that we got a pic of, walking through a food plot in the morning, as he headed back to bed. I was convinced that he’d repeat that behavior, but I’d just have to wait him out. I finally shot him on the sixth morning.”
Rather than use the term “pattern”, Borowiak feels bucks have preferred areas within their home range that they use consistently, but not daily. “You hear people talk about finding a buck’s bed, and the picture they try to paint is there’s this one small area that a buck returns to for bedding each day,” he says. “I don’t believe that’s what happens. I think bucks have a general bedding area that contains several places where he feels safe and comfortable, and he uses whatever bed within that area appeals to him on a certain day. And the same goes for food; I may glass a buck feeding in soybeans one evening, and the next he’s on alfalfa and after two nights there he switches to some acorns that have fallen. That’s one advantage of glassing; because I can cover more ground, I can get a better big-picture view of how bucks are using an area.”
Typically, by the season opener, Borowiak has identified 2 to 4 bucks that he’d be happy to shoot and has started formulating a game plan for the area. “Since the territories of these bucks overlap, I’m rarely holding out for one deer,” he says. “Instead, I’m hunting an area that I know has several bucks and I’m happy to take the first one to show up. And because I know that these bucks are not on a daily ’pattern’ that brings them to the same spot each evening, I don’t worry if I don’t see a target buck on a given night. All I’m concerned with is getting out of the stand without spooking other deer. When conditions are right, I’ll return.” Borowiak is constantly monitoring wind direction to help him choose stand sites, and he’s a religious user of Ozonics units for scent control in his stands and box blinds.
Related: Best Binoculars for 2024
While long-range glassing is at the core of his scouting program, Borowiak does use cameras to provide additional information. “I do like wireless cameras because they simply require less intrusion into a buck’s area once you have them set up,” he said. Some of his favorite camera setups are water sources in the timber (he installs water tubs on hardwood ridges, which become magnets for deer and all sorts of wildlife, including bears and bobcats). “Water is a huge draw in this country, and while I do get pics of good bucks in the summer on water, I don’t worry if I don’t. Doe family groups find these water holes in a hurry and return to them throughout the year. When the rut comes, the bucks won’t be far behind them.”
Other preferred setups are early-season food sources like soybeans, alfalfa, apples and white oak acorns. “I look for good food where there’s good fresh deer sign,” Borowiak says. “There’s a lot of food out there for deer this time of year, so I’m not expecting daily visits. Just that pic or two that confirms there’s a good buck in the area.” Such was the case with a buck he named “Big Louie”, a heavy-racked deer that showed up and posed for a single picture by an apple tree. “I hung a stand in a tree 30 yards away and hunted it several times when he never showed up,” Borowiak recalled. “Then one evening a pair of 2-½ year old bucks showed up at that apple. One didn’t stick around long and the other started acting nervous and looking behind him. When I looked that way I could see Big Louie’s rack heading my way and though he was walking cautiously he came right to that apple tree and I made the shot.”
Borowiak’s final favorite camera setup is near an early-season scrape. While many hunters associate scrapes only with rutting activity, savvy hunters like Borowiak know that deer visit scrapes year round and early fall is a peak activity time. “I don’t do a lot of mock scrapes because I’m really careful about spending too much time, and laying down human scent, in a spot that I know a big buck already likes,” he said. “But if I find a natural scrape, I’ll freshen it with some ‘Scrape Fix’ by TactaCam, which I apply to the overhanging branch and also on the ground. Then I hang my camera and get out of there.”
As noted, Borowiak took up bowhunting relatively late in life. Though he’d been a successful gun hunter for mature bucks, he definitely struggled after becoming a bowhunter. “I spent the first 8 years hunting deer that didn’t exist,” he laughs. “I was basically hunting the landscape or setting up on some fresh sign and hoping that a big buck would appear. But I had zero evidence that they were even in the neighborhood. That all changed when I started putting in my time, doing the long-range glassing and really trying to get a handle on what deer are out there and what they’re doing, long before the season even started. It’s made a huge difference.”
And while Borowiak’s summer observations have led him to some dandy bucks taken in the first weeks of the season, he’s convinced that his summer scouting efforts pay off as the fall progresses. “Not all the bucks I spot in the summer will be in spots I can hunt at the opener,” he says. “But I know they’re in the immediate area and might be huntable later. Just knowing what’s out there gives me so much confidence and enthusiasm. Almost every Minnesota buck I’ve killed, regardless of the time frame, is a deer I knew from my scouting and observations.”
Read Next: Best Cellular Trail Cameras for 2024
The post Are You Scouting for This Fall’s Buck Yet? You Should Be appeared first on Field & Stream.
Articles may contain affiliate links which enable us to share in the revenue of any purchases made.
Ballistic coefficient (BC) is a numeric representation of a bullet’s aerodynamic properties. Sabastian “Bat” Mann We may earn revenue from the products available on this page and participate in affiliate programs. Learn more › The term “ballistic coefficient”(BC) is on everybody’s lips these days. It’s […]
GunsWe may earn revenue from the products available on this page and participate in affiliate programs. Learn more ›
The term “ballistic coefficient”(BC) is on everybody’s lips these days. It’s the driving force behind the latest wave of cartridge innovation, to the point where ammo manufacturers can hardly offer a new load without touting the bullet’s high-BC. That’s fine, but given that few things are what they’re cracked up to be (especially when someone is trying to sell you something), you might wonder how important BC really is to the average hunter and shooter?
For years, hunters pretty much ignored ballistic coefficient. The term only became widely used during the last two decades, as shooters and hunters began to stretch the distance. Technically, ballistic coefficient is a numerical expression of a bullet’s aerodynamic properties, but most shooters look at it as just a number you enter into a ballistic calculator to see how much your bullet will drop or drift in the wind. You don’t need a physics degree to know that a football has better flight characteristics than a basketball, but with bullets the differences are much more subtle. Ballistic coefficient is just a way to very precisely define those aerodynamic differences. The question is: Are those differences big enough to affect your success in the field or on the range?
One problem with BC is that shooters and hunters cannot readily compute it like they can bullet weight or bullet length. Another problem is that a bullet’s BC changes with velocity. This means we must take the word of bullet manufacturers when it comes to a bullet’s BC. They estimate it based on how a bullet compares to a standard projectile with what is known as a G1 or G7 shape. (This is why we have BCs that are listed as G1 or G7.) Alternatively, the bullet’s BC is calculated by actual shooting. Most bullet manufacturers do a great job of establishing BC, but sometimes they fudge the numbers slightly for marketing purposes.
This is because BC gets so much attention these days, and because some shooters and hunters believe they must use a bullet with the highest BC possible to hit or even kill anything. This is preposterous. A high-BC bullet can help with trajectory and wind drift, but except in extreme comparisons and/or in extreme long-range situations, the advantage high-BC bullets offer is negligible. Let’s look at how high- and low-BC bullets compare and how high-velocity bullets compare to slower more aerodynamic bullets to get a better understanding of how BC influences bullet flight.
The biggest advantage with a higher-BC bullet comes when you’re comparing drastically different bullets of the same weight and caliber. A good comparison is Hornady’s 150-grain Interlock bullet with a round nose, and their 150-grain Interlock bullet of the BTSP design. The round-nose bullet has a BC of 0.186 and the BTSP bullet has a BC of 0.349. If both are fired with a muzzle velocity of 2700 fps, the higher-BC bullet will drop about 6 inches less at 300 yards. That’s substantial—and a real advantage for many hunters in the field.
However, BC discrepancies this large are rare. Most often, a hunter might be deliberating between something like a 150-grain Nosler Ballistic Tip with a 0.435 BC and a 150-grain Hornady SST bullet with a 0.415 BC. Both will deliver very similar terminal performance due to their construction, and with identical launch velocities of 2700 fps, the higher-BC Nosler Ballistic Tip bullet only drops about a quarter inch less at 300 yards. This is not enough difference to matter, unless you’re shooting M&Ms or flies at that distance.
Rifles shoot lighter bullets faster, and for a long time, velocity was how we flattened trajectories. For example, if you compare a 308 Winchester firing a 150-grain Nosler Ballistic Tip with one firing a 180-grain Ballistic Tip, you can see the advantage that high velocity provides. Even though the 180-grain bullet is more aerodynamic, from a trajectory standpoint, it cannot overcome the higher initial velocity of the 150-grain bullet. It takes a tremendous BC advantage to overcome a velocity advantage of 275 fps.
For example, if you wanted a 180-grain bullet from a 308 Winchester to deliver the same 52.54 inches of drop as the 150-grain Ballistic Tip at 500 yards, the velocity of the 180-grain bullet would either have to be increased by 205 fps or its BC would have to be doubled. The problem: a 180-grain 0.30-caliber bullet with a BC that high does not exist. This is one of the main reasons BC was not talked about so much until shooting at extreme range become more commonplace.
To shoot at long range effectively you need to be able to predict the trajectory of your bullet, and that’s been made very easy with modern ballistic calculators. You also need to be able to predict wind drift, which is easier now too. But wind drift predictions can never be exact because you cannot accurately estimate wind speed from the muzzle all the way to the target. This has made bullets with a high BC more popular with long-range shooters, because they drift less in the wind, making minor wind estimation errors less critical.
If we return to our 150 and 180 Ballistic Tip comparison, we see that the 180-grain Ballistic Tip drops a predictable 45 inches more than the 150-grain bullet at 1000 yards. The wind drift is very similar out to 500 yards, but at extreme range, the higher-BC 180-grain bullet drifts less. If we look at a .30-claiber bullet with an even higher BC, like the 178-grain Hornady ELD-X, you can see how it is even more advantageous as it relates to wind drift. And, because we can very accurately predict trajectory, the true advantage of higher-BC bullets is how well they deal with wind.
Related: Best Long-Range Hunting Cartridges
The other advantage of a high-BC bullet is its ability to retain velocity. This is important to hunters for reasons unrelated to trajectory and wind drift. The more velocity a bullet retains, the harder it hits the target. And bullets need to impact at a certain velocity—with a certain amount of energy—to initiate bullet upset or expansion. As you can see in the chart below, once you get to 500 yards, the 180-grain Nosler Ballistic Tip hits just as hard as the faster-moving 150-grain bullet, and it still retains enough velocity to initiate bullet upset. The same is truer for the even higher BC 178-grain ELD-X bullet.
In the end, there’s no question that high-BC bullets have ballistic advantages of low-BC bullets. But that doesn’t mean you should swap your favorite hunting load for one with a higher-BC bullet—because except at very long range or extreme cases (like when comparing a round nose to a spitzer bullet), BC simply doesn’t make much of a real-world difference. Even though high-BC bullet compatibility is one thing that make cartridges like the 6.5 Creedmoor and 6.5 PRC so popular, for hunters who shoot inside or not far beyond 300 yards, you don’t need to waste your time worrying about it. The same is also true for targets shooters who play at similar distances.
Where high-BC bullets have an advantage is at long, and especially extremely long distances. In these situations, where wind can be very hard to predict and sometimes range estimations can be slightly off, the more aerodynamic high-BC bullets can make getting hits easier. And for hunters who want to stretch the range to near ridiculous lengths, higher-BC bullets can hit harder because of better velocity and energy retention.
Maybe the best representation of the advantage of a high-BC bullet is to look at it this way. If you wanted to throw a ball through a hula-hoop at about 15 yards, it’s about as easy to do it with a basketball or a football. But take that hoop out to 80 yards, and the higher BC—better aerodynamics—of the football will make the throw much easier. But that doesn’t mean you can throw a football 80 yards—or should even try.
The post Ballistic Coefficient: How Much Does It Really Matter? appeared first on Field & Stream.
Articles may contain affiliate links which enable us to share in the revenue of any purchases made.